Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Below are my comments, in blue, on today's article by Chriss Wood of Casey Research, LLC. My apologies to Mr. Wood.

Meet the “Experts”…


Carol Browner – “Climate Czar”

Carol Browner's official title is “Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change.” She formerly served as Environmental Protection Agency administrator during the Clinton administration and was Florida secretary of the environment.

See any smoke-belching factories in Florida??? Damn, she’s good!

Browner was a member of the Commission for a Sustainable World Society at Socialist International, a group that Discover the Networks reports is the "umbrella for 170 'social democratic, socialist and labor parties' in 55 countries."

Well, as long as it’s just a hobby…

The Washington Times explained Browner's group called for "global governance" and asserts rich countries must shrink their economies to address climate change.

Step 1 is now complete, on our end…

Cass Sunstein – “Regulatory Czar”

According to Cass Sunstein, administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, global climate change is primarily the fault of U.S. environmental behavior and can, therefore, be used as a mechanism to redistribute the country's wealth.

“Mechanism,” in this case, means “A device for mincing US wealth into pieces beyond recognition and molding it into a new foreign currency; See also, “Carbon Credits.”

In a recent paper penned by the Obama czar, he advocated that U.S. wealth should be redistributed to poorer nations. (Doesn’t the U.S. government already do this to a substantial degree?) He also wrote, “It is even possible that desirable redistribution is more likely to occur through climate-change policy than otherwise, or to be accomplished more effectively through climate policy than through direct foreign aid.”

Hmmm…Sounds like we should look more critically at direct foreign aid.

Furthermore, in his 2004 book The Second Bill of Rights, Sunstein used the precedent of the Great Depression to point out that historic economic crises "provided the most promising conditions for the emergence of socialism in the U.S."

Only someone who is blind to the realities of history would use the words “promising” and “socialism” in the same sentence.

But who am I to argue with an individual capable of coming up with a whole Bill of Rights all by himself?

John Holdren – “Science Czar”

A longtime climate-change alarmist who has advocated ideas such as enforcing limits on world population growth, Holdren's official titles are: Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy; Assistant to the President for Science and Technology; and Co-Chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.

Zikes! I hope he still only gets one paycheck!

Apparently, Holdren's name was in the e-mails hacked from the Climatic Research Unit at East Anglia University in the U.K., which show that some climate researchers declined to share their data with fellow scientists, conspired to rig data, and sought to keep researchers with dissenting views from publishing in leading scientific journals.

After all, nothing impedes progress more than REAL science.

FrontPageMag.com noted Holdren has endorsed a “surrender of sovereignty” to “a comprehensive Planetary Regime” that would control all the world’s resources, direct global redistribution of wealth, oversee the “de-development” of the West, control a World Army and taxation regime, and enforce world population limits.

Enforce…population limits? Sounds like they want to cut off more than my pollution!

Whether you like them or hate them, it’s important to know what they stand for.

Right. They stand for Saving the World.  No, running the world.  Control of the world?   But if the world is going to hell in a hand basket, why do they want to run or control it?


For the good of the world!  No, that would be democracy and capitalism, so that can’t be it.


Enviro-Socio-plutocratism? How would a “world army” know what or who they were fighting for, against whom or why?


“Halt, who goes there?”


“Major Fecesforbrains of the Army of Enviro-Socio..”


*BANG*


“Idiot, he was on our side!”


“What side?”


“The side that believes what we do!”


“Like what?”


“ Why, the stuff we destroyed America for. World stuff.”


"I thought the Americans ruined the world.”


“They did, that’s why we took over.”


“What are we doing differently?”


“Aw, screw it. Nobody will miss that damn Major, anyway.”


No, I still don’t know what the hell they stand for!

- Chris Wood

- Casey Research, LLC

- Me

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comment?